国际常见煤炭资源/储量分类标准对比探讨

1.神华新能源有限责任公司,北京 102209; 2.武汉大学 经济与管理学院,湖北 武汉 430072; 3.中国神华海外开发投资有限公司,北京 100011; 4.中国煤炭地质总局,北京 100011

中国2002版; 煤炭资源储量; 联合矿石储量委员会

Comparative analysis of popular coal resource and reserve classification standards in the world
PENG Bei-hua1,2,DONG Da-xiao3,WANG Tong4

(1.Shenhua Renewable Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 102209,China; 2.Economics and Management School,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China; 3.China Shenhua Overseas Development and Investment Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100011,China; 4.China National Administration of Coal Geology,Beijing 100011,China)

China 2002; reserves of coal resources; JORC(Joint Ore Reserve Committee)

DOI: 10.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2017.0620

备注

随着煤炭行业国际化步伐的加快,探讨全球统一的煤炭资源/储量分类方案在业内受到重视。本文尝试着将中国2002版标准和1986版标准、俄罗斯1996版标准和JORC标准进行对比,通过对比发现,中国2002版标准和1986版标准不属于同一套标准体系,但可以对比。中国1986版标准和俄罗斯1996版标准属于同一套标准体系,但存在一定区别。中国2002版标准和JORC标准在资源量对比方面契合度较高,但在储量对比方面难度较大。除此之外研究发现,煤炭和非煤炭固体矿产资源/储量分类方案在套改前后对比方面存在差异。

With the acceleration of internationalization pace of the coal industry,establishing a global coal resources/reserves classification standard has been paid attention.This paper tries to compare various popular standards,such as China 2002,China 1986,Soviet ABC and JORC.Comparison result shows that China 2002 can be compared with China 1986 although they do not belong to a same classification system.There are some differences between China 1986 and Soviet ABC although they belong to a same classification system.China 2002 can be compared to JORC in resource classification,but it is hard to exactly compare China 2002 to JORC in reserve classification.In addition,coal and no-coal mineral classifications are different in comparing present edition with former one.