[1]许满贵,侯钦元,周山林,等.石油企业事故隐患分析模型的研究及应用[J].西安科技大学学报,2018,(04):598-603.[doi:10.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2018.0412 ]
 XU Man-gui,HOU Qin-yuan,ZHOU Shan-lin,et al.Research and application of analysis model of accident potential in petroleum enterprises[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2018,(04):598-603.[doi:10.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2018.0412 ]
点击复制

石油企业事故隐患分析模型的研究及应用(/HTML)
分享到:

西安科技大学学报[ISSN:1672-9315/CN:61-1434/N]

卷:
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
598-603
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research and application of analysis model of accident potential in petroleum enterprises
文章编号:
1672-9315(2018)04-0598-06
作者:
许满贵1侯钦元1周山林1张 帅1任彦斌2
1.西安科技大学 安全科学与工程学院,陕西 西安 710054; 2.中国石油长庆油田公司 安全环保监督部,陕西 西安 710018
Author(s):
XU Man-gui1HOU Qin-yuan1ZHOU Shan-lin1ZHANG Shuai1REN Yan-bin2
(1.College of Safety Science and Engineering,Xi'an University of Science and Technology,Xi'an 710054,China; 2.Safety and Environmental Supervision Department,PCOC,Xi'an710018,China)
关键词:
事故隐患 数据标准化 解释结构模型(ISM) 治理对策 安全生产
Keywords:
accident potential data standardization interpretative structural model countermeasures safety production
分类号:
X 937
DOI:
10.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2018.0412
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
某石油企业事故隐患重复出现,近3年来记录了30万条事故隐患数据。为解决这一问题,文中以收集到的数据资料为基础,运用SPSS软件进行数据标准化分析,总结出各类事故隐患的表现形式以及产生原因。从人的不安全行为、物的不安全状态、管理、环保4个方面结合企业实际情况总结出事故隐患类型,在此基础上建立事故隐患7级多层递阶解释结构模型(ISM)。文中分析了数据统计结果,得出石油生产过程中不仅事故隐患数量多而且表现形式复杂,需重点防治的结论,还分析了事故隐患类型的关系结构,得到事故发生的直接隐患和深层隐患,进一步提出事故隐患防治对策体系和治理对策。结果表明,在石油企业中运用多层递阶ISM能有效地建立起事故隐患层次结构,可以直观地反映出各类隐患间的层次关系,提出的事故隐患防治对策体系能有效地指导石油企业安全生产管理。
Abstract:
Accident potential has been repeated many times ina petroleum enterprisewith 300 000 incidents recorded in the past three years.To solve this problem,based on the collected data,the manifestations of accident potential and their causes was summed through data standardization analysis of SPSS software.According to the actual conditions of the enterprise,the type of accident potential was summarized from the aspects of human insecure behavior,insecure state of things,management and environmental protection.The 7-layer hierarchical interpretative structure model of accident potential was established.The results of data statistics are analyzed,and the conclusion is drawn that not only a lot number of accident potential in the petroleum production process but also the complicated manifestation of the accidents,so the prevention and treatment of the accidents need to be emphasized.The direct and deep fundamental types are obtained by analyzing the relationship structure of the types of accident potential,and the countermeasure accident potential are put forward.The results show that the hierarchical interpretative structure model can effectively establish the structure of the types of accident potential,which can directly reflect the hierarchical relationship among the accident potential,and the proposed eountermeasure system can effectively guide the management of safety production in petroleum enterprises.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨 轲,田 丹,田同生.基于SOA的石油安全生产管理系统研究[J].中国管理信息化,2010(14):75-77. YANG Ke,TIAN Dan,TIAN Tong-sheng.Research on oil production safety management system based on SOA[J].China Management Informationization,2010(14):75-77. [2] 王 强.中国石化开展安全隐患排查治理的方法与成效[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012(S1):70-73. WANG Qiang.Methods and results of the management of safety hidden trouble in Sinopec China[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012(S1):70-73. [3] Zubaidah Ismail,Keen Kuan Kong,et al.Evaluating accidents in the offshore drilling of petroleum:regional picture and reducing impact[J].Measurement,2014,5(51):18-33. [4] Abdel M Mohamed,Sameh M Saad.Development of risk assessment model for equipment within the petroleum industry[J].IFAC Papers on Line,2016,28(49):37-42. [5] Emre Akyuz.A marine accident analysing model to evaluate potential operational causes in cargo ships[J].Safety Science,2017,92:17-25. [6] Alkazimi M A,Grantham K.Investigating new risk reduction and mitigation in the oil and gas industry[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2015,34:196-208. [7] HE Jiang,WEI Xiong,CAO Yong-hui.Risk of the maritime supply chain system based on interpretative structural model[J].Polish Maritime Research,2017,24(S1):28-33. [8] Liu Z,Liu J,Li H,et al.Hierarchical and coupling model of factors influencing vessel traffic flow[J].Plos One,2017,12(4):e0175840. [9] 朱红强,张生亮,韩献林.安全环保隐患治理和应急管理的实践与探索[J].化工设计通讯,2017,43(7):219,254. ZHU Hong-qiang,ZHANG Sheng-liang,HAN Xian-lin.Practice and exploration of security and environmental hazard management and emergency management[J].Chemical Engineering Design Communications,2017,43(7):219,254. [10]石济开,邵超峰,鞠美庭.石油化工企业环境风分级评价指标体系研究[J].安全与环境学报,2015,15(2):324-330. SHI Ji-kai,SHAO Chao-feng,JU Mei-ting.Study on evaluation index system of environmental risk classification in petrochemical enterprises[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2015,15(2):324-330. [11]潘卫新.基于ISM的海上石油运输安全影响因素分析[J].大连交通大学学报,2014,35(S1):190-194. PAN Wei-xin.Analysis of influence factors of maritime oil transportation safety based on ISM[J].Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University,2014,35(S1):190-194. [12]杨 彬,于 渤,孙 倩.基于解释结构模型的海外油气开发项目风险产生机理研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2010,31(9):1259-1264. YANG Bin,YU Bo,SUN Qian.Research on risk generating mechanisms of overseas oil and gas development projects based on an interpretative structural model[J].Journal of Harbin Engineering University,2010,31(9):1259-1264. [13]张 舒,史秀志,古德生,等.基于ISM和AHP以及模糊评判的矿山安全管理能力分析与评价[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2011,42(8):2406-2416. ZHANG Shu,SHI Xiu-zhi,GU De-sheng et al.Analysis and evaluation of mine safety management capability based on ISM and AHP and fuzzy evaluation[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2011,42(8):2406-2416. [14]Yin F.Analysis of influencing factors to the maintenance quality of the aviation equipment based on interpretative structural modeling[C]//IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services.IEEE,2011:748-752. [15]Xu X,Shi J.Research on the factors affecting safety behavior based on interpretative structural modeling[J].Cluster Computing,2017:1-8. [16]Liu Y L,Shen Y F,Han C F.Development of an interpretive structural model of factors in emergency materials support[C]//International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management.IEEE,2011:503-514. [17]田彦清,杨振宏,李 华,等.基于ISM和AHP的作业场所风险影响因素研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(1):140-146. TIAN Yan-qing,YANG Zhen-hong,LI Hua,et al.Study on affecting factors of risks at workplace based on ISM and AHP[J].China Safety Science Journal,2011,21(1):140-146. [18]GB/T 6441-1986,企业职工伤亡事故分类[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1986. [19]韩荣记.建筑安全影响因素的ISM分析及对策研究[J].河北建筑工程学院学报,2006,24(4):92-94. HAN Rong-ji.ISM analysis and countermeasure research on the influencing factors of building safety[J].Journal of Hebei Institute of Architectural Engineering,2006,24(4):92-94. [20]董国永,刘景凯.中国石油集团公司HSE管理体系运行模式的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2005,1(3):47-51. DONG Guo-yong,LIU Jing-kai.The operation mode of HSE management system of CNPC[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2005,1(3):47-51. [21]董丁稳,陈 赞.基于贝叶斯分类的煤矿系统全动态定量评价[J].西安科技大学学报,2015,35(3):320-324. DONG Ding-wen,CHEN Zan.Quantitative evaluation of coal mine system security dynamic based on Bayesian classification[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2015,35(3):320-324. [22]张冬阳.信息化助力风险分级管控与隐患排查治理工作[J].中国安全生产科学术,2016(S1):296-299. ZHANG Dong-yang.Information-assisted risk grading management and hidden trouble checking and control[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2016(S1):296-299. [23]黄宇欣.基于风险的事故隐患分级模型研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2016. HUANG Yu-xin.Classification model research of potential accidents based on risks[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2016.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-12-14 责任编辑:杨泉林
通信作者:许满贵(1971-2017),陕西宝鸡人,博士,教授,E-mail:191551709@qq.com.
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-29